Showing posts with label concealed carry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label concealed carry. Show all posts

Saturday, May 3, 2014

ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL COMMANDER .45

RIA “Commander”
(A Quick Test)

     Confession:  I love 1911s.  I used to not, thought they were “old,” was tired of .45 people shoving big-bore or go home talk down my throat, etc., etc.  Taking my share of lumps for carrying “that silly nine-millimeter” Browning Hi-Power the first several years of my career didn’t endear me to joining the 1911 club.  Oh, I bought a Llama before my sworn-in days, but that only got me derided even worse.  In truth, it was one of the Spanish company's less reliable efforts so the sale of it funded my duty gear needed for the police academy.
     Then, I started shooting .45s.  Truth be told, in my pre-Browning HP days, I got to shoot one 1911.  It was a tricked out competition Colt Commander with which a now sadly deceased friend of mine was getting ready to enter local competitions.  I was new to center fire police-style courses and didn’t shoot it as well as I wanted to but it gave me an idea what I could do with time and practice.  Fast forward about three years and I wound up buying a used .45 Sig-Sauer P220 that I carried until I literally shot it to the point it was so worn that the formerly one-hole-at-25 yards pistol began shooting shotgun-like patterns at half that distance.   An H&K USP .45 solved that problem for a bit until a firing pin malady laid it out of action as well.  Yes, I had both a SIG-Sauer and an H&K go bad on me. This just proves that there is no such thing as perfect.  There may be a curse involved too, as I've had other premium pistols fail as well.  I have shot a lot of handguns over the decades and a whole lot of ammunition, though so some bad luck was bound to happen.
     In any case, the U.S. Army via their 10-33 program (the same on Obama and his cronies vilified for "militarizing the police") loaned my agency a batch of WWII era 1911-A1s. I got my pick of the litter just as my H&K began sputtering and became as reliable as a liberal’s campaign promises.  That 60 year old warhorse shot as good as my H&K and I flat out LOVED it.  I carried it and though we weren’t supposed to modify it, wound up putting a Wilson Combat ambidextrous safety on it.  In a haste to get my office cleaned out upon retirement, I wound up not having time to get my safety back (my former training Lt. told me I can come get it so long as I have the original to put back on … but so MANY boxes to go through to find such a tiny part … so … MANY boxes …).
     And here we are today.  I had to turn in the Army’s pistol when I retired.  I went to a local gun show with money burning a hole in my pocket.  One of my favorite dealers was there.  I like to think I’m one of his favorite customers as I’ve said several times I need to find him first, hand  him a check and come back in an hour to see what he thinks I needed to buy.  Lowest prices and great service.  I don’t know if he wants his name mentioned or not, but his company is Jeff's Shooter's Supply in Adger, Alabama. Jeff's shop includes NFA items, so if you’re around his neck o'the woods it’s worth giving him a call (appointment only).  That’s my unsolicited, free advertisement for the day.
     So, where was I?  Oh, yes, at a gun show looking at one of my favorite dealer's wares. There in his case, as I knew there would be, were several Rock Island Arsenal (RIA) 1911s.  I saw the Commander next to the full sized Gov’t model.  Price for either was $436.  Yep.  You read that right.  Everything I’ve read about RIA indicates they rock and perform at least as well as the much more expensive ones.  Word has it that the prestigious STI uses RIA frames for their fancy expensive pieces.  RIA is located in the Philippines.  That they are made off-shore and come at such a low price compared to the usual $700 up of other company’s pistols turn many folks away from them.  But everyone I know with one (and many whose word I trust on internet forums, sucker that I may be) give it 5 out of 5 stars.
     I chose the Commander sized pistol for its slightly better portability.  This gave me the full size frame but a 4 ¼” barrel and slide.  Thus, it has a wee bit less length to poke out from under the hem of one’s covering garment when carried on the belt, or print around one’s rear pocket in IWB carry (remember, my attempts to be tall were one of my less successful endeavors).  I love the way Commander style pistols balance in my hands so for me at least I got an even better fit than I did with the full size 1911 A-1.
     The pistol came with the usual fat wooden RIA grips.  I don’t know why RIA puts grips on their 1911 lines that are so thick the gun feels more like a double stack than an elegant single stack masterpiece designed by John M. Browning, but they do.  At the same gun show I bought a pair of thin hard rubber Hogue grips for under $20.  They make the piece feel like JMB intended:  Perfect!  It also came with one 8-round, flush fitting magazine.  Well, it has a very slight pinky rest floor plate but if you can live with that (I can) it gives you one extra round, making this a 9-shot pistol when fully loaded.  The magazine looks identical to the two Mec-Gar 8-rounders I had on hand from my previous carry of the beloved and sadly now turned in Remington-Rand.  It comes with a flat, checkered mainspring housing (like the original 1911) and what looks like the short trigger of the 1911-A1.  It looks like the ejection port is lowered a wee bit, too.  All in all, I felt it was quite nice.  I can never decide if I prefer the mainspring housing arched or not.  I’ve not found one to feel or perform better than the other in my hands.  The flat one makes the grip feel a tiny bit smaller in circumference so I see it as a plus.  The trigger is grooved rather (IMHO) aggressively.  I don’t like the way it feels on my finger, but it didn’t affect my shooting one bit.  I grabbed two boxed of PVRI-Partizan 230 grain FMJ, ran home, grabbed some Federal 230 grain Hydra-Shoks (my JHP of choice) and drove to the range.
     Upon arrival I found two police snipers were doing their weekend rifle workout.  One used to work with me and the other is newer to the game and works in the city where I live.  We talked for a bit, and then they told me they were letting their bores cool so I had a few minutes to shoot.  Good manners required I only take a tiny bit of their time, so I ran 25 rounds of the PVRI-Partizan hardball through the piece.  It ran smoothly and shot very well.  I hammered Pepper Poppers with it.  It felt like full power stuff.  Speaking for my perspective, the .45 ACP, especially in the (to me) ergonomically almost perfect 1911 format has more of a push than a shove and I was easily able to land 4 hits on Pepper Poppers before they hit the ground (before they tilted back beyond 45 degrees, actually).  I ran rapid, Hammer The Targets drills seeking to really test the magazines, the ammunition, and the weapon.  All worked fine.
     The 230 grain Federal Hydra-Shok round I’ve found to be reliable in a lot of pistols that otherwise are essentially “ball only.”  For such an aggressively expanding hollow point, it has a very rounded profile.  Anyway, I shot some water jugs (1 gallon plastic jugs) from about 5 yards.  Yes, I got wet.  First water jug blew apart.  The second one flew off the table in only slightly better shape.  The third one was pouring water out of two rather impressive holes.  The forth one was leaking rapidly from a hole next to the third jug.  The fully expanded Hydra-Shok was in the third jug.  It appears it exited the third jug, knocked a hole in the fourth jug, hitting it so hard it blew the twist-off cap off, then bounced back into the third jug.  I’ve heard of bullets going through a body in a front-to-rear shot and stretching the back skin so much that the skin snaps back like a sling-shot, propelling the bullet back into the body.  In any case that’s what happened to our bullet.  Beautiful expansion.  A piece of one of the jacket “petals” was in the first jug and one in the second as well.  A second attempt was made to shoot three remaining jugs.  The first jug blew apart as did the third jug.  The middle jug had nice entry and exit holes, but remained more-or-less in place. I guess either the pressure of the two fore and aft jugs either kept the center one in place, or the bullet began yawing when exiting the second one and smacked the third one harder.  In any case the bullet then went on and was not recovered.  Water understates penetration and overstate expansion a wee bit, speaking very generally.  So, I think I can live with that degree of penetration.  Seems unlikely to exit but likely to get deeply enough that even a really huge, muscles courtesy of Club Fed bad guy can still get his vitals punched through.  The one mammal I ever shot with that round was a medium-large dog.  It was a vicious dog, wild, and had chased (and I believe bitten) neighborhood children.  I shot it once side to side.  There was an exit and it was a pretty impressive exit.  Not fist sized or anything, that’s all in fiction.  It was roughly quarter sized, maybe just a tad smaller.  The round seems to have hit the spine and between the expanded bullet, the bone, and the about half-human-adult torso size, methinks the exit was larger than it would be in a two-legged vicious beast.  A just-to-be-sure coup-de-gras in the back of the neck/base of the skull did not exit (was later found to have done what it needed to do, was fully expanded, and carried the impression of the heavy bones it had encountered and, again, done what was needed.  I didn’t feel good about killing a canine but a wild, vicious dog with a predilection for attacking children is not a pet and there was no safe way in our means to capture it.  Judge away.  Main point is that Hydra-Shoks impressed me then and everything I read about them continues to do so.  Like something else?  That’s fine.  Carry it in good health.  For me, it’s Hydra-Shoks.
     Insofar as accuracy, again I was a bit rushed so I fired at a shoot-n-see target from the 7 yard (21 foot) line (about the max distance in most houses from which you’re likely to have to shoot an intruder and the range within which you are in critical danger if the bad guy has a knife available).  I shot about one round per second so while it wasn’t “hail of lead” it was not careful bulls-eye shooting either.
     With both types of ammo I got most rounds into one big, ragged hole.  A few “flyers” opened both groups up but neither exceeded three inches.  For an out-of-the-box, no frills 1911 with tiny military sights (though on a bright and sunny afternoon) that is excellent. It speaks volumes about the master designer that was John Moses Browning and how he designed a grip angle that is one of the most naturally pointing grips I’ve ever held.  One of the SWAT Snipers had his elementary aged kids with him so the pair, at his request got a quick hands-on-dry-fire handgun safety lesson.  Both paid apt attention as I explained very simply how to see if a weapon was empty, how to hold a pistol and a revolver (I had my EAA Big Bore Bounty Hunter .44 mag with me, too).  They were both excellent students and I left the rest of the rules up to their dear old Dad.  :)
     You can easily customize this weapon.  Don’t like the fat grips?  Toss on something different.  You can go cheap, you can go fancy.  If you don’t like the flat mainspring housing, for a few dollars you can buy an arched one and they are very easy to replace.  Left-handed shooter like me?  Ambidextrous safeties abound, some more “drop-in” than others.  Some require a grip to support them, some require a field expedient modification of the right grip.  Some cost as much as a small backup piece, some are much more reasonable.  Some are so cheap I’d have to really wonder as to their quality. Let’s face it; there are more things available for the 1911 than just about any other pistol.  It’s a fun, and actually very easy gun with which to tinker.
     Once I got home I made myself a rather nice and serviceable IWB Kydex holster.  The weapon is so thin it virtually disappears under a one-size larger T-shirt (didn't try a smaller one) and is just plain invisible with a bulky "fishing" shirt (what we have in lieu of safari shirts here in Coastal Alabama).
     So, in conclusion, $436 bought me an utterly reliable, accurate, very comfortable 1911 “Commander” like I’ve always wanted.  If you are in the market for a 1911 (I mean, you are an American, right?  Just kidding, but … yeah … ) and you don’t want to (or can’t) spend a mortgage payment on some tricked out beastie that you’d be afraid to let out of the safe lest you scratch it, look at these RIA guns.  They have a lot of styles and configurations.  I have my eye on a couple other ones, to tell the truth … ^_^


     Since first buying this pistol I have added an after market ambidextrous thumb safety.  I found a manufacturer who machines precision parts and sells them via Ebay.  The cost was low and the quality high.  It installs simply and uses an extended and slotted sear pin (very easy to install as well) to hold the right-side safety on. Thousands of manipulations later and it's showing no signs of wear and still feels about as positive as it was when I first installed it.



     I've been buffing some of the notoriously sharp edges as well, particularly those around the underside of the minuscule beaver tail of the grip safety.  Yes, RIA could have done that prior to shipping but then it'd be a $600 pistol.  Of everyone who has handled it, I'm the only one who has complained about the sharpness of that grip safety (of course, I'm the one carrying it, so... ).  

     I've put quite a few more rounds through this pistol and it has not hiccuped once. Whether shooting ball or Hydra-Shoks it just keeps on running.  I bought a 7-round mag for the Ruger 1911 that of course works fine in it.  I bought two more budget "Mil-Spec" 7-rounders as well.  They needed a bit of work (but then they cost about a buck per round so I didn't expect perfection).  Mainly the followers were overly long and had a tendency to move forward with the last round, effectively locking them in the weapon. Great way to not lose a magazine in combat, but a pretty darn bad way to keep a pistol running. A bit of patience and some skill with a Dremel and all's now well.  Those are mostly range mags, anyway.  The carry magazines I have all work great.

     I have several plans for further light customization of this so far utterly reliable and accurate pistol (oh, scoring telling hits on Pepper poppers from 25 yards and further is boringly easy), but nothing that will adversely affect its reliability or (hopefully) looks.  It's a heavy beast but recoil is easy and in a decent holster it carries quite well.  This was one of my two retirement presents to myself.  The other is a hand-forged, clay tempered katana.  I can't conceal a sword and the .45 gives me a wee bit more reach.  Both are simple yet elegant weapons which, though arguably from by-gone eras and of dated design, still serve a knowledgeable user quite well. Again, the pistol is a bit easier to carry about.  Not a bad way to celebrate 25+ years of public service, eh? 


Thursday, December 27, 2012

The Humble & Handy Glock 26

     Many years ago there was an ultra-liberal, self-serving, anti-gun president in office.  I know, I know, kinda hard to believe, except ... well, okay it's not at all hard to believe in our current predicament, but at that time we had just enjoyed 12 years of Conservative presidency.  Admittedly, President Bush the senior was not Ronald Reagan, but he wasn't half bad, all things considered.  Then came President Bill Clinton, the gun-grabber from Arkansas.  From those scary 8 years came the now infamous Assault Weapons Ban that blissfully reached it's sunset point just a very few years ago.

     If anything good can be said to have come out of that nefarious time of 10-round magazine limits, it's that manufacturers who had until then seemingly been competing to see who could build the largest, most cumbersome pistol, started seeing just how small of a pistol they could wrap around a 10 round mag.  I mean, more people than ever were getting CCW permits and those full-sized military-minded pistols get a might hard to carry discreetly in summertime.  Also, why even carry a full-sized pistol when that size was designed as a means to carry a high-cap mag and you are limited to only a 10 rounder?  Well, in amongst the new breed of ultra-compacts came the entry by GLOCK.  They took their big-honking duty pistols (the 17 round Model 17 and the 15 round Model 19) and cut 'em down around a 10 round mag.  That little engineering feat gave us the Model 26.  They did the same thing for their .40 pistols (the M22 and M23), producing the Model 27 and it's 9-round magazine.

     Those were simply TINY pistols in those days.  A pistol about the same length and height as a Walther PPK/s (very popular with CCW and LEO then), and though a bit chunky, the piece was still thinner than the diameter of the cylinder of a j-frame .38 (the main go-to BUG/ODC piece for cops and smart civvies then).  Every cop I knew wanted one.  A couple got them.  Then one day I got one.  Actually, I got the Glock 26 and then rather prohibitively expensive Emerson CQC7 folding fighter.  I hesitate to mention this, but in the interest of full disclose and for the sake of the really weird humor involved, I gotta tell you, gentle reader, they were divorce presents.  As in, "Here, I got you the pistol and knife you've been wanting."  Aw!  Gee, thanks!  "Yeah.  Have fun.  Now, then, since I gave you a present, I want one in return:  a divorce."

     I didn't realize at the time, but I came out far ahead.  I went through a few different duty pistols thereafter, but I always stayed qualified with the "Baby Glock" on our duty course and saw it more as a BackUp, Off Duty Carry, Alternate Duty Weapon.  When I got promoted and moved to CID, I still carried that G26, usually in a Renegade Ankle Rig.  Sometimes I would carry it as my duty piece if I was spending the day crawling under cars, in attics, sitting in court, etc.  Almost immediately after getting it, I swapped one flat-based mag for one with a Pierce pinky extension.  I used the flat mag for ankle and pocket carry (yes, pocket carry, and yes it's a wee bit thick for that, but I somehow made it work ... somehow).  The finger extension was for belt carry, shoulder carry, or pretty much any other time.   A co-worker, owing me for a holster (that he later retired still owing me for) gave me a 17 round Glock mag as a down payment.  There were times when that became the carry-in-the-pistol mag as even back then I felt that the most important round count was what was immediately available in your hand rather than what was in a pocket, or mag pouch.

     I  used to be assigned to "low profile" work during various festivals, block parties, and other events wherein it was believe that nefarious activity might be afoot.  "Low-Profile" is what a lot of folks call "under cover" but in real UC work, you have a cover ID, some background, and hopefully, if they love you, some backup.  I did a little UC work and enjoyed it, but Low-Profile was what I did most:  blending in with the crowd, seeming to just be one of the good ol' boys, until something happened.  Of course that meant I had usually NO cover, NO back-up, and in those days, very questionable communication abilities.  I describe those assignments as, "Gee, how can we get the red-haired, left-handed, pain in the patookus killed this weekend?"  It was not unheard of for me to carry the Glock sans holster.  Yep, just stuck in the belt, usually appendix carry (or more like descending colon carry I guess, given my South-paw perspective [not to mention, I haven't had an appendix since I was 10]).  Yeah, I know, unsafe, dangerous, reckless, and other bad things as well.  Save it.  I TRIED to trip the trigger on an  unloaded Glock carried thusly several times and never managed to find a way to manage it.  It worked well for me, stayed put, and was FAST to draw.  It was also different times and a lot of us didn't use holsters for low-profile and off-duty carry.  That said, yes you should use one or at least one of those little clips-over-the-trigger-and-pops-off-via-lanyard-on-your-belt jobbies.  There, liability avoided (insert notice that I am in no way responsible for what you choose to do).

     Spring forward a few years.  I stopped the nekkid-gun carry and stuck with holsters of various makes.  They all added too much bulk for IWB carry (and I was starting to grow those dreaded early middle age love handles by then but shhhh!  I'm hoping no one will notice).  I had many other options and finally retired my old companion.  Recently, however, after some training, research and deep thought (especially after some ALERT training, sorta hard-core and in depth training wherein one learns how to take on active shooters either alone or with pretty much anyone who you can get to go with you), I came to see the benefit of having a lot of rounds on hand.  Now, I still carry my Kahr PM40, especially when it's boiling hot outside.  I carry a S&W 30-1 sometimes or even my .32 PPK (the latter two especially if some old hand/ wrist injuries, or these days my old friend arthritis flair up).  But that Baby Glock is finding its way into or onto my waistband more and more frequently.  I usually carry that 17 rounder as the main backup mag.  Yes, I've heard that if you grip it wrong and put too much pressure on that over-sized mag body hanging out of the piece you can jam the gun.  I don't usually have any pressure on the body of the mag, and have shot it a LOT without a problem, so I feel comfortable doing this.  Plus I practice failure drills like crazy so ... yeah ... I think I'm good.

     Okay, we've covered some history (maybe a wee bit too much of mine, but I tend to blab).  What about the piece, you ask?  It's had thousands of rounds through it.  I lost count long ago, but I'm sure I'm well into the plural thousands.  The trigger on mine is phenomenal for the type.  I knew a gunsmith who worked on his own G26 until he thought it was perfect.  He tried my out-of-the-box-but-well-used trigger and cursed ... and cursed some more.  Then one evening he dropped by my house (the sort of bloke who'll sit in his car on the road in front of your house for half an hour talking because he doesn't have time to come in).  He had worked on another cop's G26 and smugly told me he finally surpassed even the trigger on my G26.  I tried the trigger (dry fire, of course).  I agreed it was indeed the best smithed trigger I'd ever felt on a Glock of any model.  While he was glowing in that review, I unloaded mine and handed it over.  He dry fired mine exactly once before handing it back to me rather rudely, calling both my birth and familial relationships into question, and driving off in something I like to describe as a snit.  Heh-heh-heh.

      With that trigger it shoots very well indeed.  In truth, however, I've never shot a Glock 26 (or it's .40 caliber fraternal twin the 27) that wasn't very accurate.  The factory sights are combat sights and most decidedly NOT target sights.  In fact, at the 25 yard line, the blocky front post takes up most of the chest of a combat target.  Still, it takes little time to figure that you just put that big-o'front sight right under the spot where you want to hit, like the bullet is sitting atop the sight post, drop it down inside the rear sight with equal height and equal light and you will hit where you are aiming.  I recently did some prone 50 yard silhouette shooting and was impressed with that that short, chunky piece would do with it's just a hair under 3.5" barrel and some standard 115 gr FMJ ammo.  Mine is currently stoked for carry with Federal's excellent 124gr +P+ HST load.  The Net Nannies and Armchair Commandos (and a few real experts) either like it or hate it.  It's 100% reliable in my pistol, accurate, does well against auto glass and auto bodies (I sometimes get to have fun with a donated vehicle), so I like it.  I used to carry Federal 9BPLE (115 gr +P+ JHP).  On a borrowed chronograph  I got an honest 1275 fps from that short bbl.  I haven't had a chrono handy since switching loads, but how much difference can 9 grains of bullet weight make, methinks?  Anyway that's up there near short barreled .357 magnum velocity with a similar bullet so I see very little to complain about. (Edited 02/10/2014:  I sometimes still carry the 9BPLE as since retiring I have far more of these on hand than the HST loads).

      So, it shoots, keeps shooting so long as it's fed, hits hard (for a pistol), but how does it carry?  It has precious few sharp corners. Almost every surface is rounded and comfortable against skin.  Almost.  When I  press the trigger with my left trigger finger, the magazine release gouges me.  Simple fix, really, I just filed the offending corner off the button with an emery board.  Now it's not a problem.  That little arch on the rear of the grip is supposed to make it fit the contour of the palm, I guess.  I think it adds too much bulk and leaves a nice place for lint and dust to gather in the mainspring.  I've seen Glocks with that arch cut off and the grips sanded and refinished ... but I just can't bring myself to do that with my pistol ... yet.  It is in truth just a wee bit long front-to-back to properly fit my hand, but for all that it still points well, shoots softly, hits where aimed, and all that, so, well, so what if it doesn't feel like it fits just right?

       For those wanting a .40 (and willing to forget that the case-head of the cartridge is not, in the opinion of many, property supported in the .40 caliber Glocks ... look up "kaboom"), the G27 is a great option.  Essentially the same piece only giving up one round to house the fatter .40s, it is the softest shooting mini-.40 I've ever fired, and I have fired several.  Just the other day I qualified an old friend on the range.  His g/f gave him a G27 for Christmas and he wanted to tote it off-duty.  His qualification (rapid present and fire to very rapid present and fire stages from 15, 7, and 3 yards) was excellent and was the first time he'd shot the brand new pistol.  We then spent a while breaking it in and once more, I was impressed with the design.  Yes, yes, we shot it along side my Kahr PM40.  My PM40 is much smaller and a bit lighter, but that means it pushes a bit more.  Honestly they make great mild-weather/hot weather companion guns.  The PM40 when you'd otherwise go unarmed or with a mousegun (no offense, I like mouseguns), and the Glock 26 or 27 when you can tote something just a wee bit bigger overall.

       Recently I started making some Kydex holsters, finding few out there that I liked or that I was willing to part with my hard earned cash for just to most likely see them in the Box of Holsters That Didn't Quite Work For Me.  That box, excuse me, those boxes, are way too full now.  Kydex is so thin I can make a good IWB holster that adds very little bulk to the chunky Glock so it can ride tucked in my waistband nearly as comfortably as it did when riding "nekkid," but is in truth firmly clipped to my belt.  Also, a paddle design I've been playing with keeps it tight into the body so a light over-shirt (or X-L Aloha shirt) and it hides quite well. There's something about knowing  you have 28 rounds at hand in two magazines (10 round mag, 17 round mag, and one round chambered) that's mighty satisfying when  you find yourself somewhere with a suspicious character or two loitering about.

     So to sum up, I've rediscovered my old friend, the Glock 26.  I think our time apart did us some good.   Oh, and it's fun to shoot, too.