Showing posts with label RKBA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RKBA. Show all posts

Monday, February 10, 2014

Walther PPK/s .22

     My affection for Walther firearms is well known.  I've carried three different PPK pistols in my time as a police officer, through all my ranks and job positions.  I did some of my best talking to convince a then not-gun-friendly (and not very me friendly) administrator to issue me a PPK/s that the department had in inventory.  I also owned a Walther P22 (.22LR) that is a delight to shoot and even had it in the car with me occasionally in addition to my regulation armament as a “just in case” piece. 
     I say “had” the P22 because when my wife and I were dating she proved eager to learn how to shoot and proved to be a very good student.  My P22 at some point became her P22 (much as my Ruger 10-22 became her Ruger 10-22 once she shot it).  Oh, it’s still in my house, within reach from my side of the bed, in fact, but just ask her and she’ll make it quite clear that while it’s OUR cars, OUR house, OUR money, it’s HER gun.  ;)
     My wife proved to also be as big a James Bond fan as I am (insofar as the movies go; I haven’t convinced her to read the original Ian Fleming books just yet).  Come to find, she was enamored with the PPK (which I think is one of the most elegant pistols ever made and still frequently find myself carrying either of my personal ones in spite of other “better” pistols in my armory).  However, one severe automobile accident left her with her very dominant right arm being held together by a plate and screws.  Given her already size extra tiny hands, a .380 anything was not in the cards for her (she’s the toughest person I know but two shot with a Beretta .380 and her arm was out of commission for the whole day).  The two PPK examples I have now are .32s and are right on the cusp of manageable for her.  But she doesn’t want to borrow one of my guns, she wants HER gun, and is far more comfortable with a .22 or .25 which, by the way, she shoots well enough to put the rounds where they need to go.
     Well, there we were, at the annual weekend-before-our-Valentine’s Day/Wedding Anniversary gun show.  This is where she usually tells me to go buy a gun for myself from her to me with the admonishment “I don’t buy cheap crap.”  Yes, she loves guns, is a great shot, is a big James Bond (movie) fan, loves Walthers, and sends me to buy guns as her gifts to me.  No you can’t have her and though, yes, she has a sister, they are quite different.
     Where was I?  Oh, yeah, gun show -   We eventually found ourselves drawn like moths to a flame to the table of the dealer  from whom I usually wind up making a purchase more gun shows than not.  In fact, I have told him we should just save time by me just handing him a signed check when I walk in the door and him just handing me what he thinks I’ll want and letting me know how much it cost me.  I pointed out to my wife a brand new Walther PPK/s .22 in a display case.  This is one of the new ones that have just been out for a year or so.  I’ve read mixed reviews on it.  The worst labeled it as essentially a pellet gun that aspired to being an actual pistol.  The best essentially said it worked and the commenter was keeping his.
     Wife fell head over heels right there.  She asked me to give it the once-over before she held it.  It was placed in my hand and it felt rock-solid.  It felt for all the world like my blued steel 1967 sample and did not, in any way, feel like a beefed up pellet gun.  I was actually surprised at how well put together it appeared to be.  I passed it to her and she all but drooled on the display case.  If she were a guy she would have drooled.  Hell, I think I did drool!  She agreed the blued (actually black kinda Parkerized type coating) model was better looking than the chrome version.  She asked the lady at the case to please hold it and stationed me to guard her and the piece from the crowd whilst she ran back to the car to get her ID which she’d accidentally left behind.  When she returned, she filled out the paperwork, passed over our debit card, and, cradling her new baby with our checking account about four bills lighter, made one more circuit of the show with me before we left.
     By the time we ate a late lunch time had gotten away from us so it was the next day (Sunday – blue laws be darned to heck) that we got to go to the shooting range.  By then, of course, I’d had time to give the piece a good going over. My initial impression stayed in place.  It was solid and sturdy.  The barrel is like the one on the P22 in that the actual barrel is a liner that goes inside a tube which surrounds it and gives it the girth to look “normal.”  The barrel sleeve has an end cap near the muzzle that threads on and has notches for a spanner.  This, I imagine, will take the threaded adapter to fit a suppressor that the P22 uses.  We’ve discussed this a few times and now that she has the PPKs I think a can might be in our future.
     It weighs less than my ’67 .32 PPK, but still has heft.  I’ve seen the original .22 models of the PP and PPK where the slide is milled down presumably to reduce the weight.  The new PPKs .22 has a standard-looking slide. To me this looks much better (“elegant,” I call it), though I’d love to have one of those originals which thus far has escaped my collection.
     Manual of arms and disassembly is the same as for the center-fire relatives.  After making sure the weapon is empty (no mag, empty chamber), pull down on the front of the trigger guard and when it clears the underside of the frame push it slightly to one side so it’ll rest on the frame but not return to its previous point (a wee bit of sideways pressure from a finger will keep it there for the rest of this procedure).  Pull the slide all the way back and lift up the rear.  When you see/feel it tilt up, run the slide forward off the frame.  The recoil spring goes around the barrel.  In theory, one end of the spring is slightly belled out (hard to see in my example).  That end goes toward the muzzle.  Reassembly is reverse.  Sometimes it takes a bit of jiggling to get the barrel back through the bushing hole in the front of the slide.  This can be eased by some careful and slow positioning of the barrel to the hole.  Once the slide is back on, let the front of the trigger guard go back home and work the slide a few times to ensure it’s all properly in place.
     To load, insert a full mag, point somewhere safe, pull back the slide and let it go forward entirely under its own power.  Do not “ride the slide” forward … with any pistol that I can think of.  Leave that in the movies.  The hammer will be cocked.  Rotating the safety lever (left side of slide) down will lock the firing pin and drop the hammer.  Keep the muzzle pointed somewhere safe while doing this.  Personally, I like to apply the safety while slowing the hammer’s decent with a thumb just to keep from abusing the mechanism.  The first shot may be fired Double Action (DA) by simply aiming and pulling the trigger.  The slide will cock the hammer when it goes back and all subsequent shots (until you again apply the safety) are fired Single Action (SA).  You can also cock the hammer to get around the quite heavy initial DA pull.  This is such a familiar trait to anyone used to the PP series of Walthers that I call any pistol with a very heavy DA pull followed by light and smooth SA pull “Walther-esque.”  If you have strong hands, you’ll get the first round off DA no problem.  If you have very small, or weak, or arthritic hands, you might need to just plan on cocking the hammer. 
     There are two schools of thought on carrying a PP series of any caliber.  One is that since the only way the firing pin is locked is to have the safety on, “Safety-On” is the only way to go and the other guys are unsafe idiots.  The other school is of the opinion that since the weapon has a hammer block in the frame that prevents the hammer from touching the firing pin until the trigger is pulled, “Safety-Off” carry is fine and preferable if you understand that danger happens in an instant and you’re likely to fumble or forget levers.  “Safety-Off” folks tend to think of the other side as Nervous Nannies that should stick to ranges and not give themselves ulcers by actually carrying a loaded gun.  It’s like Alabama vs. Auburn or Cubs vs. Cardinals or North vs. South.  Understand your piece as well as the guy who built it, know your world, and make up your own mind.  Leftys like me don’t really get a choice.
     At the range, Milady loaded up the 10 round mag like a champ.  It is very similar to the P22’s mag and comes with a Walther-esque finger rest at the bottom.  The finger rest lets a ham-handed lad like me get three fingers on the grip.  The magazine is not interchangeable with the P22’s, unfortunately.  That would have been a nice extra from Walther, as would have been including the little tab on the side of the mag to pull down the follower to aid in loading.  The P22 had that feature, the PPKs does not.
     With wife’s new pistol in hand and her blessing to put the first mag through it (isn’t she GREAT?), I walked up to the 7 yard line, racked in the first round and fired at a Shoot-n-See® bullseye target.  I shot a nice, if slightly left of center group.  For the first rounds through the piece, my “new gun jitters,” and, I don’t know, planetary alignments or whatever, I was impressed.  No, it’s not a target pistol.  But minute-of-heart, or minute-of-eye-socket-and-nose from 21 feet ain’t half bad. 
     The accuracy did not decrease with about 250 rounds of CCI Mini-Mags® and Herself’s groups often involved three or four rounds from a magazine tearing a single, ragged hole from 7 yards.  Given time and perhaps some experimentation with different ammo, I can see someone being able to tighten the groups up impressively.  But, .22 ammo is scarce in our AO and most of what we have are the afore-mentioned Mini-Mags® because they work in all of our other .22LR firearms.  They proved to work quit well in the Walther PPKs as well.  Your experience may vary, but when someone can only pick one type, I usually recommend Mini-Mags® for a start.  In a short barreled .22 pistol, I don’t worry about hollow-points unless that’s just all there is available because it is highly doubtful they will get up enough velocity to expand and with tiny bullets, penetration is your friend.  Our load out was, in fact, hollow points and they fed just fine. 
     Before we called it a day, I shot it side-by-side with my afore-mentioned blued .32 PPK.  Accuracy was on par (excellent) and though the .32 PPK can hardly be said to kick hard, the .22LR PPKs seemed to barely move in my hand.  Oh, and FWIW, it is at least as accurate as the P22, at least in my hands or Herself’s.  Neither of us had any issue with the infamous “Walther-bite” where a too-high grip (or thick hands) get the web cut by the slide.  I think the pistol’s almost utter lack of muzzle flip contributed to that bit of Heaven.
     At around four hundred bucks it is not a cheap pistol.  It is, however, a fun pistol and one that pretty much anyone can shoot comfortably (except for the strain of finding enough .22 LR ammo to make a worthy outing to the range – hopefully this will change soon when supply catches up with demand).  If you want cheap, there are tons of little zinc alloy wonders out there.  If you want a piece that you can be proud of, handle like a real gun and not a delicate flower that might crack in a couple hundred rounds, and even rely on for self-defense (limits of cartridge, blah-blah, higher misfires with rimfire rounds, blah-blah), I think it’ll be darn hard to beat this new Walther .22 PPKs.  One thing’s for sure:  I think I “won” this year’s Anniversary/Valentine gift giving competition.  Anyone who doesn’t think these occasions are competitions hasn't been married very long. ;)

--- Go Shooting and Take a Newbie!

Thursday, December 27, 2012

The Humble & Handy Glock 26

     Many years ago there was an ultra-liberal, self-serving, anti-gun president in office.  I know, I know, kinda hard to believe, except ... well, okay it's not at all hard to believe in our current predicament, but at that time we had just enjoyed 12 years of Conservative presidency.  Admittedly, President Bush the senior was not Ronald Reagan, but he wasn't half bad, all things considered.  Then came President Bill Clinton, the gun-grabber from Arkansas.  From those scary 8 years came the now infamous Assault Weapons Ban that blissfully reached it's sunset point just a very few years ago.

     If anything good can be said to have come out of that nefarious time of 10-round magazine limits, it's that manufacturers who had until then seemingly been competing to see who could build the largest, most cumbersome pistol, started seeing just how small of a pistol they could wrap around a 10 round mag.  I mean, more people than ever were getting CCW permits and those full-sized military-minded pistols get a might hard to carry discreetly in summertime.  Also, why even carry a full-sized pistol when that size was designed as a means to carry a high-cap mag and you are limited to only a 10 rounder?  Well, in amongst the new breed of ultra-compacts came the entry by GLOCK.  They took their big-honking duty pistols (the 17 round Model 17 and the 15 round Model 19) and cut 'em down around a 10 round mag.  That little engineering feat gave us the Model 26.  They did the same thing for their .40 pistols (the M22 and M23), producing the Model 27 and it's 9-round magazine.

     Those were simply TINY pistols in those days.  A pistol about the same length and height as a Walther PPK/s (very popular with CCW and LEO then), and though a bit chunky, the piece was still thinner than the diameter of the cylinder of a j-frame .38 (the main go-to BUG/ODC piece for cops and smart civvies then).  Every cop I knew wanted one.  A couple got them.  Then one day I got one.  Actually, I got the Glock 26 and then rather prohibitively expensive Emerson CQC7 folding fighter.  I hesitate to mention this, but in the interest of full disclose and for the sake of the really weird humor involved, I gotta tell you, gentle reader, they were divorce presents.  As in, "Here, I got you the pistol and knife you've been wanting."  Aw!  Gee, thanks!  "Yeah.  Have fun.  Now, then, since I gave you a present, I want one in return:  a divorce."

     I didn't realize at the time, but I came out far ahead.  I went through a few different duty pistols thereafter, but I always stayed qualified with the "Baby Glock" on our duty course and saw it more as a BackUp, Off Duty Carry, Alternate Duty Weapon.  When I got promoted and moved to CID, I still carried that G26, usually in a Renegade Ankle Rig.  Sometimes I would carry it as my duty piece if I was spending the day crawling under cars, in attics, sitting in court, etc.  Almost immediately after getting it, I swapped one flat-based mag for one with a Pierce pinky extension.  I used the flat mag for ankle and pocket carry (yes, pocket carry, and yes it's a wee bit thick for that, but I somehow made it work ... somehow).  The finger extension was for belt carry, shoulder carry, or pretty much any other time.   A co-worker, owing me for a holster (that he later retired still owing me for) gave me a 17 round Glock mag as a down payment.  There were times when that became the carry-in-the-pistol mag as even back then I felt that the most important round count was what was immediately available in your hand rather than what was in a pocket, or mag pouch.

     I  used to be assigned to "low profile" work during various festivals, block parties, and other events wherein it was believe that nefarious activity might be afoot.  "Low-Profile" is what a lot of folks call "under cover" but in real UC work, you have a cover ID, some background, and hopefully, if they love you, some backup.  I did a little UC work and enjoyed it, but Low-Profile was what I did most:  blending in with the crowd, seeming to just be one of the good ol' boys, until something happened.  Of course that meant I had usually NO cover, NO back-up, and in those days, very questionable communication abilities.  I describe those assignments as, "Gee, how can we get the red-haired, left-handed, pain in the patookus killed this weekend?"  It was not unheard of for me to carry the Glock sans holster.  Yep, just stuck in the belt, usually appendix carry (or more like descending colon carry I guess, given my South-paw perspective [not to mention, I haven't had an appendix since I was 10]).  Yeah, I know, unsafe, dangerous, reckless, and other bad things as well.  Save it.  I TRIED to trip the trigger on an  unloaded Glock carried thusly several times and never managed to find a way to manage it.  It worked well for me, stayed put, and was FAST to draw.  It was also different times and a lot of us didn't use holsters for low-profile and off-duty carry.  That said, yes you should use one or at least one of those little clips-over-the-trigger-and-pops-off-via-lanyard-on-your-belt jobbies.  There, liability avoided (insert notice that I am in no way responsible for what you choose to do).

     Spring forward a few years.  I stopped the nekkid-gun carry and stuck with holsters of various makes.  They all added too much bulk for IWB carry (and I was starting to grow those dreaded early middle age love handles by then but shhhh!  I'm hoping no one will notice).  I had many other options and finally retired my old companion.  Recently, however, after some training, research and deep thought (especially after some ALERT training, sorta hard-core and in depth training wherein one learns how to take on active shooters either alone or with pretty much anyone who you can get to go with you), I came to see the benefit of having a lot of rounds on hand.  Now, I still carry my Kahr PM40, especially when it's boiling hot outside.  I carry a S&W 30-1 sometimes or even my .32 PPK (the latter two especially if some old hand/ wrist injuries, or these days my old friend arthritis flair up).  But that Baby Glock is finding its way into or onto my waistband more and more frequently.  I usually carry that 17 rounder as the main backup mag.  Yes, I've heard that if you grip it wrong and put too much pressure on that over-sized mag body hanging out of the piece you can jam the gun.  I don't usually have any pressure on the body of the mag, and have shot it a LOT without a problem, so I feel comfortable doing this.  Plus I practice failure drills like crazy so ... yeah ... I think I'm good.

     Okay, we've covered some history (maybe a wee bit too much of mine, but I tend to blab).  What about the piece, you ask?  It's had thousands of rounds through it.  I lost count long ago, but I'm sure I'm well into the plural thousands.  The trigger on mine is phenomenal for the type.  I knew a gunsmith who worked on his own G26 until he thought it was perfect.  He tried my out-of-the-box-but-well-used trigger and cursed ... and cursed some more.  Then one evening he dropped by my house (the sort of bloke who'll sit in his car on the road in front of your house for half an hour talking because he doesn't have time to come in).  He had worked on another cop's G26 and smugly told me he finally surpassed even the trigger on my G26.  I tried the trigger (dry fire, of course).  I agreed it was indeed the best smithed trigger I'd ever felt on a Glock of any model.  While he was glowing in that review, I unloaded mine and handed it over.  He dry fired mine exactly once before handing it back to me rather rudely, calling both my birth and familial relationships into question, and driving off in something I like to describe as a snit.  Heh-heh-heh.

      With that trigger it shoots very well indeed.  In truth, however, I've never shot a Glock 26 (or it's .40 caliber fraternal twin the 27) that wasn't very accurate.  The factory sights are combat sights and most decidedly NOT target sights.  In fact, at the 25 yard line, the blocky front post takes up most of the chest of a combat target.  Still, it takes little time to figure that you just put that big-o'front sight right under the spot where you want to hit, like the bullet is sitting atop the sight post, drop it down inside the rear sight with equal height and equal light and you will hit where you are aiming.  I recently did some prone 50 yard silhouette shooting and was impressed with that that short, chunky piece would do with it's just a hair under 3.5" barrel and some standard 115 gr FMJ ammo.  Mine is currently stoked for carry with Federal's excellent 124gr +P+ HST load.  The Net Nannies and Armchair Commandos (and a few real experts) either like it or hate it.  It's 100% reliable in my pistol, accurate, does well against auto glass and auto bodies (I sometimes get to have fun with a donated vehicle), so I like it.  I used to carry Federal 9BPLE (115 gr +P+ JHP).  On a borrowed chronograph  I got an honest 1275 fps from that short bbl.  I haven't had a chrono handy since switching loads, but how much difference can 9 grains of bullet weight make, methinks?  Anyway that's up there near short barreled .357 magnum velocity with a similar bullet so I see very little to complain about. (Edited 02/10/2014:  I sometimes still carry the 9BPLE as since retiring I have far more of these on hand than the HST loads).

      So, it shoots, keeps shooting so long as it's fed, hits hard (for a pistol), but how does it carry?  It has precious few sharp corners. Almost every surface is rounded and comfortable against skin.  Almost.  When I  press the trigger with my left trigger finger, the magazine release gouges me.  Simple fix, really, I just filed the offending corner off the button with an emery board.  Now it's not a problem.  That little arch on the rear of the grip is supposed to make it fit the contour of the palm, I guess.  I think it adds too much bulk and leaves a nice place for lint and dust to gather in the mainspring.  I've seen Glocks with that arch cut off and the grips sanded and refinished ... but I just can't bring myself to do that with my pistol ... yet.  It is in truth just a wee bit long front-to-back to properly fit my hand, but for all that it still points well, shoots softly, hits where aimed, and all that, so, well, so what if it doesn't feel like it fits just right?

       For those wanting a .40 (and willing to forget that the case-head of the cartridge is not, in the opinion of many, property supported in the .40 caliber Glocks ... look up "kaboom"), the G27 is a great option.  Essentially the same piece only giving up one round to house the fatter .40s, it is the softest shooting mini-.40 I've ever fired, and I have fired several.  Just the other day I qualified an old friend on the range.  His g/f gave him a G27 for Christmas and he wanted to tote it off-duty.  His qualification (rapid present and fire to very rapid present and fire stages from 15, 7, and 3 yards) was excellent and was the first time he'd shot the brand new pistol.  We then spent a while breaking it in and once more, I was impressed with the design.  Yes, yes, we shot it along side my Kahr PM40.  My PM40 is much smaller and a bit lighter, but that means it pushes a bit more.  Honestly they make great mild-weather/hot weather companion guns.  The PM40 when you'd otherwise go unarmed or with a mousegun (no offense, I like mouseguns), and the Glock 26 or 27 when you can tote something just a wee bit bigger overall.

       Recently I started making some Kydex holsters, finding few out there that I liked or that I was willing to part with my hard earned cash for just to most likely see them in the Box of Holsters That Didn't Quite Work For Me.  That box, excuse me, those boxes, are way too full now.  Kydex is so thin I can make a good IWB holster that adds very little bulk to the chunky Glock so it can ride tucked in my waistband nearly as comfortably as it did when riding "nekkid," but is in truth firmly clipped to my belt.  Also, a paddle design I've been playing with keeps it tight into the body so a light over-shirt (or X-L Aloha shirt) and it hides quite well. There's something about knowing  you have 28 rounds at hand in two magazines (10 round mag, 17 round mag, and one round chambered) that's mighty satisfying when  you find yourself somewhere with a suspicious character or two loitering about.

     So to sum up, I've rediscovered my old friend, the Glock 26.  I think our time apart did us some good.   Oh, and it's fun to shoot, too.